ความคิดเห็นที่ 1
จริงๆแล้ว ถ้าคุณ Men ได้อ่านต่อไปจาก Wikipedia ก็ได้เขียนเอาไว้แล้วนะครับเรื่องข้อโต้แย้งเกี่ยวกับ Heretic Peribsen
Today this theory as well as Lauer and Firth conclusions are widely questioned. Archaeological evidence of Peribsen has only been found in Upper Egypt. In particular, his name does not appear in Lower Egyptian records surviving from that time. Therefore, it is argued that Peribsen cannot have ruled over all of Egypt and that he was not in a position to require all Egyptians to support a new form of state religion. Another piece of evidence that argues against the "heretic Peribsen" theory is the false door of the priest Shery at Sakkara. Shery held office during the early 4th dynasty. The inscription on the false door connects the name of Peribsen in one sentence with another shadowy king of the 2nd dynasty, Senedj. According to the addendum, Shery was "overseer of all wab-priests of king Peribsen in the necropolis of king Senedj, in his mortuary temple and at all other places". This implies that the funerary cult of Peribsen continued at least until the 4th dynasty, which is inconsistent with the theory that Peribsen was considered to be heretic. Additionally, Egyptologists such as Herman te Velde point out that Shery was not the only 4th dynasty priest participating in the funerary cult of Peribsen. Shery's possible brother or cousin Inkef also held the title of a 'supervisor of Ka-priests of Peribsen'.[13> Moreover, seal impressions found in Peribsen's tomb at Abydos show several deities among which Ash, Min and Bastet, which must have been venerated during Peribsen´s time on the throne. This is further evidence against the theory that Peribsen tried to introduce a completely new state religion.[14>[15>[16> The heretic theory of Newberry, Černý, Grdseloff and others was devised from the very limited archaeological information available during their lifetimes, which made the problem of understanding Peribsen's name widely open to speculations.[17> | โดย: เจ้าบ้าน  [9 ธ.ค. 56 19:42] ( IP A:101.109.80.166 X: ) |  |
ความคิดเห็นที่ 2
หลักๆคือมันเป็นแค่แนวคิดเก่า ด้วยหลักฐาน 3 อย่างที่ใ้ห้ไว้น่ะครับ ซึ่งจริงๆแล้วมันก็มีหลักฐานอื่นๆอีกที่สามารถมาหักล้างแนวคิดนั้นได้เช่น
Another piece of evidence that argues against the "heretic Peribsen" theory is the false door of the priest Shery at Sakkara. Shery held office during the early 4th dynasty.
หรือที่บอกว่า
Moreover, seal impressions found in Peribsen's tomb at Abydos show several deities among which Ash, Min and Bastet, which must have been venerated during Peribsen´s time on the throne. This is further evidence against the theory that Peribsen tried to introduce a completely new state religion.
จริงๆแล้วคุณ Men ควรอ่านทำความเข้าใจทั้งหมดก่อนจะดีกว่าครับ เพราะว่าสิ่งเหล่านี้คือสมมติฐาน ซึ่งมันก็สามารถมีกาีรหักล้างได้ตามหลักฐานที่ค้นพบใหม่ และตอนนี้ก็ดูเหมือนว่าแนวคิดเรื่อง Heretic Peribsen จะล้าสมัยไปแล้วน่ะครับ  | | โดย: Detectiveoat13 (เจ้าบ้าน ) [9 ธ.ค. 56 19:45] ( IP A:101.109.80.166 X: ) | |
|
